Monitoring the Built-up Area Transformation Using Urban Index and Normalized Difference Built-up Index Analysis

Authors

1 Department of Civil and Planning, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

2 Department of Geography, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Abstract

Makassar is one of the metropolitan cities located in Indonesia which recently experiences massive an increased construction because of population growth. Mapping the spatial distribution and development of the built-up region is the best method that can use as an indicator to set the urban planning policy. The purpose of this study is to identify changes in land use and density in Makassar City that occurred in 2013 and 2017 primarily for built areas, including settlements using optical data, especially Landsat data. The data analyzed by using multi-temporal Landsat OLI 8 data taken from 2013 to 2017. Normalized Difference Built-Up Index (NDBI), Urban Index (UI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are the spectral indices produced from Landsat OLI band covering Short Wave Infrared (SWIR) wavelength, visible Red (R) and Near Infrared (NIR) areas that can be revealed by examining changes in land use and area cover. The result shows that both spectral indices namely NDBI and UI indicate an increased built-up area approximately 18 and 6%, respectively over four years. Also, based on NDBI reveals that most an increased built-up area distributes in the north of Makassar (Biringkanaya sub-district), meanwhile UI shows that Biringkanaya and Manggala sub-districts experience an increased built-up area. The development of the city will also never be separated from the history of city growth, current conditions, and the growth of the town to come. The phenomenon of the development of the town will include the development of city elements in detail, aspects of the shape of the town and the development of city regulations.

Keywords


1. Congalton, R.G., “A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 37, No. 1, (1991), 35–46.
2.Weng, Q., “Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic 652 M. Ichsan Ali et al. / IJE TRANSACTIONS B: Applications Vol. 32, No. 5, (May 2019) 647-653modelling.” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 64, No. 3, (2002), 273–284.
3.Millette, T.L., Tuladhar, A.R., Kasperson, R.E., and Turner II, B.L., “The use and limits of remote sensing for analyzing environmental and social change in the Himalayan Middle Mountains of Nepal.” Global Environmental Change, Vol. 5, No. 4, (1995), 367–380.
4.Masek, J.G., Lindsay, F.E., and Goward, S.N., “Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from Landsat observations.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 21, No. 18, (2000), 3473–3486
5.Maru, R., Baharuddin, I.I., Zhiddiq, S., Arfan, A., and Bayudin, B., “Trend Analysis of Urban Heat Island Phenomenon in the City of Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia using Landsat.” Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 5, (2015), 477–484.
6.Barnes, K.B., Morgan III, J.M., Roberge, M.C., and Lowe, S., “Sprawl development: its patterns, consequences, and measurement.” Towson University, Towson, (2001), 1–24.
7.Weng, Q., “Remote sensing of impervious surfaces.” Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.
8.Xu, H., “A new index for delineating builtā€up land features in satellite imagery.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 29, No. 14, (2008), 4269–4276.
9.Chen, X.L., Zhao, H.M., Li, P.X., and Yin, Z.Y., “Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 104, No. 2, (2006), 133–146.
10.Zha, Y., Gao, J., and Ni, S., “Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 24, No. 3, (2003), 583–594.
11.Zhao, H., and Chen, X., “Use of normalized difference bareness index in quickly mapping bare areas from TM/ETM+.” In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS’05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International IEEE, 2005, 1666–1668
12.Rikimaru, A., and Miyatake, S., “Development of forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model using indices of vegetation, bare soil and shadow.” In Presented paper for the 18th ACRS Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1997.
13.As-syakur, A.R., Adnyana, I.W.S., Arthana, I.W., and Nuarsa, I.W., “Enhanced built-UP and bareness index (EBBI) for mapping built-up and bare land in an urban area.” Remote Sensing, Vol. 4, No. 10, (2012), 2957–2970.
14.He, C., Shi, P., Xie, D., and Zhao, Y., “Improving the normalized difference built-up index to map urban built-up areas using a semiautomatic segmentation approach.” Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 1, No. 4, (2010), 213–221.
15.Wicaksono, P., Danoedoro, P., Hartonom., and Nehren, U., “Mangrove biomass carbon stock mapping of the Karimunjawa Islands using multispectral remote sensing.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 37, No. 1, (2016), 26–52.
16.Irons, J.R.; Dwyer, J.L.; and Barsi, J.A., “The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat Data Continuity Mission.” Remote Sensing of Environment, (2012), 1–11.
17.Guo, G., Wu, Z., Xiao, R., Chen, Y., Liu, X., and Zhang, X., “Impacts of urban biophysical composition on land surface temperature in urban heat island clusters.” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 135, (2015), 1–10.
18.Kawamura, M., Jayamana, S., and Tsujiko, Y., “Relation between social and environmental conditions in Colombo Sri Lanka and the urban index estimated by satellite remote sensing data.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing, Vol. 31, (1996), 321–326.
19.U.S. Geological Survey, “Product Guide: Landsat Surface Reflectance-Derived Spectral Indices.” Reston, Virginia: Department of the Interior, 2017.
20.Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W., and Chipman, J.W., “Remote sensing and image interpretation.” John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, (2004).
21.Yüksel, A.; Akay, A.E.; and Gundogan, R., “Using ASTER imagery in land use/cover classification of eastern Mediterranean landscapes according to Corine land cover project.”Sensors, Vol. 8, No. 2, (2008), 1237–1251.
22.Tran, T.D.-B., Puissant, A.; Badariotti, D., and Weber, C., “Optimizing spatial resolution of imagery for urban form detection: the cases of France and Vietnam.” Remote Sensing, Vol. 3, No. 10, (2011), 2128–2147.
23.Soegaard, H., and Møller-Jensen, L., “Towards a spatial CO2 budget of a metropolitan region based on textural image classification and flux measurements.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 87, No. 2–3, (2003), 283–294.
24.Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E.P., Gao, X., and Ferreira, L.G., “Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 83, No. 1–2, (2002), 195–213
25.Weng, Q., Lu, D., and Schubring, J., “Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies.” Remote sensing of Environment, Vol. 89, No. 4, (2004), 467–483.