Hydrophobicity Properties of Graphite and Reduced Graphene Oxide of The Polysulfone (PSf) Mixed Matrix Membrane

Authors

1 ntegrated Materials Process (IMP), Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Centre (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

2 Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

3 Integrated Materials Process (IMP), Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Centre (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

4 Faculty of Science, Technology and Human Development, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Parit Raja, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

5 aculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

Abstract

Hydrophobicity properties of graphite and green synthesized graphene (gsG) from exfoliated graphite/GO towards polymer membrane characteristic and properties at different weight percentage concentrations (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 wt. %) were investigated. PSf/graphite and PSf/gsG membranes were characterized in term of hydrophobicity, surface bonding, surface roughness and porosity. FTIR peaks revealed that membrane with graphite and green synthesized graphene nearly diminished their O-H bonding which was opposite to the graphene oxide peak that show a strong O-H bonding as increased exfoliated time was reported in our previous work. These results were also in line with the contact angle results that showed strong hydrophobicity for the graphite and green synthesized graphene membranes which were then opposed to the exfoliated graphene oxide membrane that has strong affinity towards hydrophilicity properties (as mentioned in previous conducted works). The effect of strong hydrophobicity in modified membrane has result in smoother surface roughness compared to PSf membrane with exfoliated graphene oxide. Results of the surface roughness were in line with the FTIR transition peaks hydrophilicity of exfoliated graphene oxide. It showed that the transition peaks slowly reduced as increasing the formation of green synthesized graphene powder indicating the increment of hydrophobicity properties. The decreased of pure water flux was attributed to the decreased hydrophilicity. From the overall results, it is concluded that the hydrophobicity of PSf/graphite and PSf/green synthesized graphene membrane is not suitable to be applied in water separation whilst be potential for oil and dye separation.

Keywords


1.     J. Zhang, Q. Xue, X. Pan, Y. Jin, W. Lu, D. Ding, and Q. Guo, “Graphene oxide / polyacrylonitrile fiber hierarchical-structured membrane for ultra-fast microfiltration of oil-water emulsion”, Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 307, (2017), 643–649.
2.     W. Lei, H. Li, L. Shi, Y. Diao, Y. Zhang, and R. Ran, “Applied Surface Science Achieving enhanced hydrophobicity of graphene membranes by covalent modification with polydimethylsiloxane”, Applied Surface Science, Vol. 404, (2017), 230–237.
3.     H. Cao, W. Gu, J. Fu, Y. Liu, and S. Chen, “Applied Surface Science Preparation of superhydrophobic / oleophilic copper mesh for oil-water separation”, Applied Surface Science, Vol. 412, (2017), 599–605.
4.     S. N. W. Ikhsan, N. Yusof, F. Aziz, and N. Misdan, “A Review of Oilfield Wastewater Treatment using Membrane Filtration Over Conventional Technology”, Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 3, (2017), 643–658.
5.     M. Padaki, R. S. Murali, M. S. Abdullah, N. Misdan, A. Moslehyani, M. A. Kassim, N. Hilal, and A. F. Ismail, “Membrane technology enhancement in oil – water separation. A review”, Desalination, Vol. 357, 197–207, 2015.
6.     M. Padaki, R. S. Murali, M. S. Abdullah, N. Misdan, A. Moslehyani, M. A. Kassim, N. Hilal, and A. F. Ismail, “Membrane technology enhancement in oil – water separation. A review”, DesalinationVol. 357, (2015), 197–207.
7.     Pulido B.A., C. Waldrom, M.G. Zolotukhin and S.P. Nunes, “Porous Polymeric Membranes with Thermal and Solvent Resistance”, Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 539, (2017), 167-196.
8.     S. Hajar, M. Akhair, Z. Harun, and M. Riduan, “Polymer Mixed Matrix Membrane with Graphene Oxide for Humic Acid Performances,” Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 56, (2017), 697–702.
9.     M. Z. Yunos and M. F. Shohur, “Performance Studies of Polysulfone-Based Membrane : Effect of Silica Morphology”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 372, (2013), 8–12.
10.   D. M. Ficai, A. Ficai, G. Voicu, B. S. Vasile, and C. Guran, “Polysulfone based Membranes with Desired Pores Characteristics”, Material Plastic, Vol. 47, No. 1, (2010), 24-27.
11.   I. Akin, E. Zor, H. Bingol, and M. Ersoz, “Green synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline composite and its application for salt rejection by polysulfone-based composite membranes”, Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 118, No. 21, (2014), 5707–5716.
12.   V. Georgakilas, J. N. Tiwari, K. C. Kemp, J. A. Perman, A. B. Bourlinos, K. S. Kim, and R. Zboril, “Noncovalent Functionalization of Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Energy Materials, Biosensing, Catalytic, and Biomedical Applications”, Chemical Review., Vol. 116, No. 9, (2016), 5464–5519.
13.   I. Barbolina, C. R. Woods, N. Lozano, K. Kostarelos, K. S. Novoselov, and I. S. Roberts, “Purity of graphene oxide determines its antibacterial activity”, 2D Material, Vol. 3, No. 2, (2016), 25025.
14.   K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, A. A. Firsov, “Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films”, Sciences, Vol. 306, (2004), 666–669.
15.   L.-Y. Meng and S.-J. Park, “Preparation and Characterization of Reduced Graphene Nanosheets via Pre-exfoliation of Graphite Flakes”, Bulletin of Korean Chemical Society, Vol. 33, No. 1, (2012), 209–214.
16.   L. Shahriary and A. a. Athawale, “Graphene Oxide Synthesized by using Modified Hummers Approach,” International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, (2014), 58–63.
17.   S. Hajar, M. Akhair, Z. Harun, and M. Riduan, “Effect of Graphene Oxide with Controlled Stirring Time”, Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 56, No. 2004, (2017), 709–714.
18.   K. Elumalai, S. Velmurugan, S. Ravi, V. Kathiravan, and S. Ashokkumar, “Bio-fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of curry leaf (Murraya koenigii) and its antimicrobial activities”, Material Science Semiconductor Process, Vol. 34, (2015), 365–372.
19.   H. Lu, Y. Yao, W. M. Huang, and D. Hui, “Noncovalently functionalized carbon fiber by grafted self-assembled graphene oxide and the synergistic effect on polymeric shape memory nanocomposites”, Composites Part B: EngineeringVol. 67, (2014), 290-295.
20.   G. Lee and B. S. Kim, “Biological Reduction of Graphene Oxide Using Plant Leaf Extracts”, Biotechnology progressVol. 30, No. 2, (2013), 463–469.
21.   M. Upadhyay, N. Prajpati, N. M. Patel, and P. M. Patel, “Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Archives, Vol. 2, No. 6, (2011), 1636–1642.
22.   B. R. Kumar and T. S. Rao, “Afm Studies on Surface Morphology, Topography and Texture of Nanostructured Zinc Aluminum Oxide Thin Films”, Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, Vol. 7, No. 4, (2012), 1881–1889.
23.   M. R. Jamalludin, Z. Harun, H. Basri, M. Z. Yunos, M. F. Shohur, N. N. Aminudin, and N. Rosman, “The effect of polyethelene glycol on the performance of polysulfone membrane blend with silica from rice husk”, Journal Teknologi Sciences Engineering, Vol. 65, No. 4, (2013), 53–57.
24.   Y. Yuan and T. R. Lee, Contact Angle and Wetting Properties. In: Bracco G., Holst B. (eds) Surface Science Techniques. Springer Series in Surface Sciences, Vol 51. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013) 3-34.
25.   M. Riduan, Z. Harun, and S. Khadijah, “Chemical Engineering Research and Design Antifouling polysulfone membranes blended with green SiO2 from rice husk ash (RHA) for humic acid”, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Vol. 114, pp. 268–279, 2016.
26.   E. Bagheripour, A. R. Moghadassi, S. M. Hosseini, and M. Nemati, “Fabrication and Characterization of Novel Mixed Matrix Polyethersulfone Nanofiltration Membrane Modified by Iron-Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles”, Journal of Membrane Science and Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, (2016), 14–19.
27.   S. K. Datta, H. Saha, and S. Majumdar, “Selective Detection of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Gas by Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) at Room Temperature”, Royale Society of Chemistry, Vol. 6, No. 53, (2016), 47337-47348.
28.   Z. Tang, Z. Zhang, Z. Han, S. Shen, J. Li, and J. Yang, “One-step synthesis of hydrophobic-reduced graphene oxide and its oil/ water separation performance”, Journal Material Science, Vol. 51, No.19, (2016), 8791-8798.