Mathematical Model for Estimation of Return to Scale in Four-Level Green Supply Chain by using Data Envelopment Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Roudehen branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

2 Department of Mathematics, Firoozkooh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh, Iran

3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Today, focusing on gaining a competitive edge in the global business market lies in enhancing supply chain performance. This study endeavors to examine the attainment of Returns To Scale (RTS) within a four-level green supply chain framework through the application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). To achieve this objective, the Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (BCC) multiplicative model are employed to determine the return to scale at each level within the complete supply chain, ultimately culminating in estimating the overall return to scale for the entire supply chain. The statistical population for this applied research, aligned with its objectives, comprises 42 cement companies. The assessment of returns to scale in these companies, featuring a four-level chain encompassing suppliers, manufacturers, distributors, and customers, is measured. The outcomes of the model reveal that return to scale remains constant in 28 companies, exhibits a decreasing trend in 14 companies, and conversely demonstrates an increasing trajectory in 2 companies within the supplying sector, one company in manufacturing, and 14 companies in distribution. The findings underscore that an increasing return to scale renders the expansion of Decision-Making Units (DMUs) economically viable. Conversely, a diminishing return to scale suggests a rational limitation of DMUs.

Graphical Abstract

Mathematical Model for Estimation of Return to Scale in Four-Level Green Supply Chain by using Data Envelopment Analysis

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research. 1978;2(6):429-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  2. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Journal of the operational research society. 1997;48(6):656-. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600779
  3. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G. Network Dea II. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Handbook on the Modeling of Internal Structures and Networks. 2014:307-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9
  4. Saranga H, Moser R. Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. European journal of operational research. 2010;207(1):197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.023
  5. Chen C, Yan H. Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. European journal of operational research. 2011;213(1):147-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.010
  6. Tavana M, Mirzagoltabar H, Mirhedayatian SM, Saen RF, Azadi M. A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2013;66(2):501-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.07.016
  7. Mirhedayatian SM, Azadi M, Saen RF. A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics. 2014;147:544-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.009
  8. Shafiee M, Lotfi FH, Saleh H. Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Applied mathematical modelling. 2014;38(21-22):5092-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.023
  9. Grigoroudis E, Petridis K, Arabatzis G. RDEA: A recursive DEA based algorithm for the optimal design of biomass supply chain networks. Renewable Energy. 2014;71:113-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.001
  10. Khodakarami M, Shabani A, Saen RF, Azadi M. Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: An application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement. 2015;70:62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.024
  11. Tajbakhsh A, Hassini E. A data envelopment analysis approach to evaluate sustainability in supply chain networks. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;105:74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.054
  12. Tavana M, Kaviani MA, Di Caprio D, Rahpeyma B. A two-stage data envelopment analysis model for measuring performance in three-level supply chains. Measurement. 2016;78:322-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.10.023
  13. Yousefi S, Soltani R, Saen RF, Pishvaee MS. A robust fuzzy possibilistic programming for a new network GP-DEA model to evaluate sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;166:537-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.054
  14. Fathi A, Saen RF. A novel bidirectional network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating sustainability of distributive supply chains of transport companies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;184:696-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.256
  15. Darvish Motevalli MH, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Shoja N, Gholamabri A. A new model for calculating the efficiency of existing cement companies with a network structure (an application of data envelopment analysis). Financial engineering and portfolio management. 2019;10(38):65-93. 20.1001.1.22519165.1398.10.38.4.0
  16. Tavassoli M, Saen RF. Predicting group membership of sustainable suppliers via data envelopment analysis and discriminant analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2019;18:41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.12.004
  17. Torabi N, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Najafi E, Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi F. A two-stage green supply chain network with a carbon emission price by a multi-objective interior search algorithm. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects. 2019;32(6):828-34. 10.5829/ije.2019.32.06c.05
  18. Asadpour M, Boyer O, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. A blood supply chain network with backup facilities considering blood groups and expiration date: a real-world application. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications. 2021;34(2):470-9. 10.5829/ije.2021.34.02b.19
  19. Fathollahi-Fard AM, Dulebenets MA, Hajiaghaei–Keshteli M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Safaeian M, Mirzahosseinian H. Two hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain network design problem in the tire industry under uncertainty. Advanced engineering informatics. 2021;50:101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101418
  20. Moosavi S, Seifbarghy M. A robust multi-objective fuzzy model for a green closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and reliability (a case study in engine oil industry). International Journal of Engineering, Transactions C: Aspects. 2021;34(12):2585-603. 10.5829/ije.2021.34.12c.03
  21. Sahraeian R, Afshar MA, Hosseini SMH. A bi-objective cold supply chain for perishable products considering quality aspects: a case study in Iran dairy sector. International Journal of Engineering Transactions B: Applications. 2022;35(2). 10.5829/ije.2022.35.02b.22
  22. Gholizadeh H, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Fazlollahtabar H, Charles V. Fuzzy data-driven scenario-based robust data envelopment analysis for prediction and optimisation of an electrical discharge machine’s parameters. Expert Systems with Applications. 2022;193:116419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116419
  23. Moosavi J, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Dulebenets MA. Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022;75:102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
  24. Berlin D, Feldmann A, Nuur C. The relatedness of open-and closed-loop supply chains in the context of the circular economy; framing a continuum. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain. 2022;4:100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
  25. Haghshenas P, Sahraeian R, Golmohammadi A-M. A state-of-the-art model of location, inventory, and pricing problem in the closed-loop supply chain network. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications,. 2022;35(8):1558-70. 10.5829/ije.2022.35.08b.12
  26. Asghari M, Afshari H, Mirzapour Al-e-hashem S, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Dulebenets MA. Pricing and advertising decisions in a direct-sales closed-loop supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2022;171:108439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108439
  27. Simonetto M, Sgarbossa F, Battini D, Govindan K. Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics. 2022:108582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108582
  28. Mousapour Mamoudan M, Ostadi A, Pourkhodabakhsh N, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Soleimani F. Hybrid neural network-based metaheuristics for prediction of financial markets: a case study on global gold market. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering. 2023;10(3):1110-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwad039
  29. Ali SM, Fathollahi-Fard AM, Ahnaf R, Wong KY. A multi-objective closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty: An efficient Lagrangian relaxation reformulation using a neighborhood-based algorithm. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023;423:138702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138702
  30. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science. 1984;30(9):1078-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  31. Abri AG. An investigation on the sensitivity and stability radius of returns to scale and efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Applied mathematical modelling. 2013;37(4):1872-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.047
  32. Zhang Q, Yang Z. Returns to scale of two-stage production process. Computers & industrial engineering. 2015;90:259-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.09.009
  33. Alirezaee M, Hajinezhad E, Paradi JC. Objective identification of technological returns to scale for data envelopment analysis models. European journal of operational research. 2018;266(2):678-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.016
  34. Wang Z, He W, Wang B. Performance and reduction potential of energy and CO2 emissions among the APEC's members with considering the return to scale. Energy. 2017;138:552-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.059
  35. Banker RD, Thrall RM. Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of operational research. 1992;62(1):74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90178-C
  36. Alefeld G, Herzberger J. Introduction to interval computation: Academic press; 2012.
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 4
TRANSACTIONS A: Basics
April 2024
Pages 608-624

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics